<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Sholis &#187; Short Take</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briansholis.com/category/formats/short-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briansholis.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Light Years: Conceptual Art and the Photograph&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/light-years-conceptual-art-and-the-photograph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/light-years-conceptual-art-and-the-photograph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conceptual art]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A note about the Art Institute of Chicago's 2011-12 exhibition "Light Years: Conceptual Art and the Photograph, 1964-77."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While in Chicago last week, I visited the exhibition “<a href="http://www.artic.edu/aic/collections/exhibitions/LightYears/index" target="_blank">Light Years: Conceptual Art and the Photograph, 1964-77</a>” at the <a href="http://www.artic.edu/aic" target="_blank">Art Institute</a>. It’s a remarkable show. Although its argument about the role of Conceptual Art in bringing the photography “definitively into the mainstream of contemporary art” is debatable, it succeeds in several other arenas: first, as an exhibition of conceptually oriented objects that is neither dry nor didactic; second, as a sketch of the precedents available to the artists included in Douglas Eklund’s 2009 exhibition “<a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2009/pictures-generation" target="_blank">The Pictures Generation</a>”; third, as an eloquent testimonial to the importance of southern and eastern European art to the histories of Conceptualism (a reclamation project spurred on a decade ago by Jane Farer’s wonderful “<a href="http://listart.mit.edu/node/278" target="_blank">Global Conceptualism</a>” exhibition). &#8220;Light Years,&#8221; curated by Matthew S. Witkovsky, is on view in Chicago until March 11, and I highly recommend it. The catalogue, too, is well done, and available for more than forty percent off at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0300159714/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank">Amazon</a>. For those who can&#8217;t visit, Witkovsky published a reconsideration of photographic abstraction in the <a href="http://www.artforum.com/inprint/issue=201003" target="_blank">March 2010 <em>Artforum</em></a>, the text of which is available <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0268/is_7_48/ai_n56979500/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/light-years-conceptual-art-and-the-photograph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40 Watt Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/40-watt-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/40-watt-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief note about 40 Watt Sun's <i>The Inside Room</i>, one of my favorite metal albums of the year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/brandonstosuy" target="_blank">Brandon Stosuy</a>’s <a href="http://pitchfork.com/features/show-no-mercy/8717-best-albums-of-2011/" target="_blank">roundup</a> of the best metal albums of 2011 alerted me to the London-based band <a href="http://www.40wattsun.com/" target="_blank">40 Watt Sun</a>, now also one of my favorite discoveries of this year. Other reviewers were sharply divided on the record’s merits, something Stosuy acknowledges when he notes that the “sweeping hooks, painful, introspective lyrics, and [Patrick] Walker’s clear, soaring voice” are “elements that could be cheesy if not handled with such delicacy or well-earned confidence.” Four of the album’s five tracks stretch over nine minutes each, and their consistency means you’ll know very quickly know whether you’ll like the whole record. Imagine a British Eddie Vedder singing over the top of <a href="http://www.avalancheinc.co.uk" target="_blank">Jesu</a>, or <a href="http://www.isistheband.com" target="_blank">Isis</a> covering <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_House_Painters" target="_blank">Red House Painters</a>, or a 45 RPM record by mid-1990s emo band <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_(band)" target="_blank">Mineral</a> played at 33 RPM. The songs are crunchy, drawn out, and so sluggish as to seem static—perfect for late-night cross-country drives, as I discovered last night. Find out more and listen to samples <a href="http://www.metalblade.com/40wattsun/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/40-watt-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Politics, Considered Twice</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/arizona-politics-considered-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/arizona-politics-considered-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Landscape and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two recent articles on politics in Arizona.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By coincidence I&#8217;ve just read two sharp analyses of Arizona politics in separate publications. At <em>The New Inquiry</em>, Alex Aums and James Broulard <a href="http://thenewinquiry.com/post/11992813690/the-geography-of-failed-revolt" target="_blank">discuss</a> the #OccupyWallStreet-influenced protests in Phoenix, and meditate in the process upon geography, demography, and &#8220;symbolic politics.&#8221; Meanwhile, in a recent issue of the <em>London Review of Books</em>, Jeremy Harding <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n20/jeremy-harding/the-deaths-map" target="_blank">reports</a> on the state&#8217;s transformation into a &#8220;militarized desert principality.&#8221; His thoughtful presentation of first-person accounts from both sides of the border is well worth the time it takes to read his 11,000-word essay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/arizona-politics-considered-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simon Kuper&#8217;s Soccer Men</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/simon-kupers-soccer-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/simon-kupers-soccer-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookforum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A link to my review of journalist Simon Kuper's book <em>Soccer Men</em>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://goal.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/19/q-a-with-soccer-men-author-simon-kuper/" target="_blank">recent interview</a> with the <em>New York Times</em>, journalist Simon Kuper, coauthor of the acclaimed 2009 book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1568584253/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank"><em>Soccernomics</em></a>, claims that he thinks &#8220;people are almost as interesting as numbers.&#8221; His new collection of soccer profiles, titled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1568586876/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank"><em>Soccer Men</em></a>, gave me a chance to test that claim; having done so, I think the emphasis in his statement should be placed on the word <em>almost</em>. To read my review of the book, head to <a href="http://bookforum.com/review/8544" target="_blank">Bookforum.com</a>. &#8220;Kuper&#8217;s admiring portraits of an earlier generation of great talkers—from Johann Cruijff to Lothar Matthaüs to Jorge Valdano—reveal that his irritation with today&#8217;s players is due as much to broader developments in the game as it is to their individual traits.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/simon-kupers-soccer-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ferguson and Faust</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/ferguson-and-faust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/ferguson-and-faust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Sir Alex Ferguson, Manchester United coach and Civil War buff, know he met one of the war's foremost scholars?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, during the friendly match between <a href="http://www.manutd.com/" target="_blank">Manchester United</a> and the <a href="http://www.revolutionsoccer.net/" target="_blank">New England Revolution</a>, the ESPN commentators said that United&#8217;s coach, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Ferguson" target="_blank">Sir Alex Ferguson</a>, is a Civil War buff, and that during last summer&#8217;s tour of the United States he made a pilgrimage to  <a href="http://www.gettysburg.travel/" target="_blank">Gettysburg</a>. Today the <em>Telegraph</em> presents a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/8657042/Manchester-Uniteds-extra-curricular-activities-during-their-2011-pre-season-tour-of-the-USA.html" target="_blank">slide show</a> of the English club&#8217;s &#8220;extra-curricular&#8221; activities on this year&#8217;s tour, including a visit to Harvard University. Does Ferguson know that Harvard&#8217;s President, Drew Gilpin Faust, who is standing next to him in <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/8657042/Manchester-Uniteds-extra-curricular-activities-during-their-2011-pre-season-tour-of-the-USA.html?image=3" target="_blank">this photo</a>, is a world-renowned Civil War scholar? Has he read her most recent book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375703837/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank"><em>This Republic of Suffering</em></a>? This could be a <a href="http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/mis/" target="_blank">Missed Connection</a> of epic proportions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/ferguson-and-faust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foner and McGirr, eds, American History Now</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/foner-and-mcgirr-eds-american-history-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/foner-and-mcgirr-eds-american-history-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>American History Now</em> is an imaginative overhauling of the invaluable sourcebook of essays on recent developments in American history, increasing the total number of texts and dividing them roughly evenly between accounts ordered chronologically and those ordered thematically. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I received a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1439902445/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank"><em>American History Now</em></a>, a brand-new collection of historiographical essays edited by <a href="http://www.ericfoner.com/" target="_blank">Eric Foner</a> and <a href="http://history.fas.harvard.edu/people/faculty/mcgirr.php" target="_blank">Lisa McGirr</a>. Published for the <a href="http://historians.org/" target="_blank">American Historical Association</a> by <a href="http://www.temple.edu/tempress/titles/2085_reg.html" target="_blank">Temple University Press</a>, the book supplants <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1566395526/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank"><em>The New American History</em></a>, which came out in 1990 and was revised in 1997. The new volume is an imaginative overhauling of the invaluable sourcebook of essays on recent developments in American history, increasing the total number of texts and dividing them roughly evenly between accounts ordered chronologically and those ordered thematically. If you have the earlier edition—I do, and it was very useful for my comprehensive exam—you’ll want this one, too, as the editors have invited a new generation of scholars to weigh in with fresh surveys of their particular fields of expertise. A few examples will suffice: <a href="http://history.ucdavis.edu/professor/alan_taylor" target="_blank">Alan Taylor</a> on the colonial era; <a href="http://www.gallatin.nyu.edu/academics/faculty/kpf2.html" target="_blank">Kim Phillips-Fein</a> on the last four decades; <a href="http://history.fas.harvard.edu/people/faculty/manela.php" target="_blank">Erez Manela</a> on “The United States in the World”; <a href="http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~amciv/faculty/beckert.shtml" target="_blank">Sven Beckert</a> on the history of American capitalism; <a href="http://www.columbia.edu/cu/history/fac-bios/Ngai/faculty.html" target="_blank">Mae Ngai</a> on immigration and ethnic history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/foner-and-mcgirr-eds-american-history-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Los Angeles Review of Books</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/the-los-angeles-review-of-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/the-los-angeles-review-of-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Review of Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'd like to point you to the Los Angeles Review of Books, a new and ambitious book-review publication.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to point you to the <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/" target="_blank"><em>Los Angeles Review of Books</em></a>, a new and ambitious book-review publication. A temporary site was launched last spring, and despite its interim nature it boasts some wonderful review-essays. I&#8217;ve been reading it since April, and scanning its <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/toc" target="_blank">Table of Contents</a> reminds me of some thoughtful and sharply written pieces, including <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/post/4926689615/life-of-the-party" target="_blank">Kathryn Schulz</a> on Sarah Bakewell&#8217;s life of Montaigne; <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/post/6243684487/man-is-not-cat-food" target="_blank">Barbara Ehrenreich</a> on human-animal relationships; <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/post/6036553913/posthumous" target="_blank">Chris Kraus</a> on Simone Weil; and Mark McGurl&#8217;s controversial <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/post/5389807479/the-mfa-octopus-four-questions-about-creative-writing" target="_blank">response</a> to Elif Batuman&#8217;s controversial <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v32/n18/elif-batuman/get-a-real-degree" target="_blank">review</a> of his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674033191/insearchofthe-20" target="_blank">book</a> on MFA fiction-writing programs. I eagerly await the unveiling of the full <em>LARB</em> site, and hope its funding (from <a href="http://creativewriting.ucr.edu/" target="_blank">UC Riverside</a> and other places) creates a sustainable platform for such writing for a long time to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/the-los-angeles-review-of-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1970s</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/the-1970s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/the-1970s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links to articles and discussions concerning books about and from the 1970s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those whose thirst for commentary on the 1970s wasn&#8217;t quenched by Rick Perlstein&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/155492/seventies-show" target="_blank">recent summary</a> of a dozen or so books on the topic, the <a href="http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/017_04" target="_blank">December/January issue</a> of <em>Bookforum</em> features <a href="http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/017_04/6672" target="_blank">another such round-up</a>, this time by historian Kim Phillips-Fein. For assessment of another side of life during that decade, consider <a href="http://us-intellectual-history.blogspot.com/2010/11/what-would-intellectual-history-of-70s.html" target="_blank">the discussion taking place at the US Intellectual History blog</a> concerning Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen&#8217;s paper, delivered at the group&#8217;s recent conference, on Robert Pirsig&#8217;s <em>Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance</em>. Lastly there the recently published anthology <em>The Shock of the Global</em>, edited by four eminent historians, which I mentioned in passing <a href="http://www.briansholis.com/john-gray-on-the-shock-of-the-global/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/the-1970s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luc Sante on &#8220;The Last Newspaper&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/luc-sante-on-the-last-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/luc-sante-on-the-last-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luc Sante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several years ago, when Robert Silvers spoke at 192 Books, the New York Review of Books editor was asked what subject he felt was the most difficult to write about. &#8220;Contemporary art&#8221; was his answer, and he said that he was hoping to cover more recent art in the pages of his journal. While I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago, when Robert Silvers spoke at <a href="http://www.192books.com" target="_blank">192 Books</a>, the <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/" target="_blank"><em>New York Review of Books</em></a> editor was asked what subject he felt was the most difficult to write about. &#8220;Contemporary art&#8221; was his answer, and he said that he was hoping to cover more recent art in the pages of his journal. While I haven&#8217;t seen much that qualifies as discussion of contemporary art from the likes of <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/search/?q=sanford+schwartz&amp;origin=magazine&amp;qsort=" target="_blank">Sanford Schwartz</a>, Luc Sante visits the New Museum exhibition &#8220;The Last Newspaper&#8221; and reports back for the NYRBlog. <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/nov/01/disappearing-ink/" target="_blank">He doesn&#8217;t like what he finds</a>: &#8220;For all that numerous artists and curators genuinely believe themselves  to be engaged, the art world is too rich, too hermetic, and too pleased  with itself to have any more rapport with what is happening &#8216;on the  street&#8217; than did the art establishment Hans Haacke and cohorts were  trying to overturn circa 1968. But then, in taking on the lame-duck  medium that is the newspaper, the show is even further insulated from  actuality.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/luc-sante-on-the-last-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind</title>
		<link>http://www.briansholis.com/profit-motive-and-the-whispering-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briansholis.com/profit-motive-and-the-whispering-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Take]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansholis.com/?p=3428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent weeks I’ve found myself thinking frequently about Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind, an experimental 2008 documentary by filmmaker John Gianvito. I saw it that summer at Anthology Film Archives, and was happy to learn that this hour-long plaintive meditation on radical American history—and how it has been encoded in the country’s landscape—is available as a free online stream at SnagFilms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent weeks I’ve found myself thinking frequently about <em>Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind</em>, an experimental 2008 documentary by filmmaker John Gianvito. I saw it that summer at <a href="http://anthologyfilmarchives.org/" target="_blank">Anthology Film Archives</a>, and was happy to learn that this hour-long plaintive meditation on radical American history—and how it has been encoded in the country’s landscape—is available as a free online stream at <a href="http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/profit_motive_and_the_whispering_wind/" target="_blank">SnagFilms</a>. As <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/movies/01moti.html" target="_blank">A.O. Scott noted</a> in the <em>New York Times</em>, “The calling of birds and the rustle of trees provide most of the commentary, and the effect is somehow to make history more mysteriously distant and more concrete—a matter of stone and weathered plaques inscribed with the records of half-forgotten deeds.” <a href="http://www.jonathanrosenbaum.com/?p=14993" target="_blank">Here</a> is a longer meditation on two of Gianvito&#8217;s films by Jonathan Rosenbaum, who compares the film to those by Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet. Rosenbaum says, &#8220;Gianvito’s various ways of approaching the graves, memorials, and  shrines through the surrounding landscapes that nestle and sometimes  hide these largely unremarked sites is every bit as important as their  inscriptions.&#8221; I highly recommend the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briansholis.com/profit-motive-and-the-whispering-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<marquee style="width: 0px; position: absolute">
<a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/sitemap.xml" title="porno" target="_blank">porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/arananlar" title="porno" target="_blank">porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Amator-porno" title="Amator porno" target="_blank">Amator porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Anal-porno" title="Anal porno" target="_blank">Anal porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Arap-porno" title="Arap porno" target="_blank">Arap porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Asyali-porno" title="Asyali porno" target="_blank">Asyali porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Emo-porno" title="Emo porno" target="_blank">Emo porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Full-porno" title="Full porno" target="_blank">Full porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Gay-porno" title="Gay porno" target="_blank">Gay porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Gizli-cekim-porno" title="Gizli cekim porno" target="_blank">Gizli cekim porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Grup-porno" title="Grup porno" target="_blank">Grup porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Hard-porno" title="Hard porno" target="_blank">Hard porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Hemsire-porno" title="Hemsire porno" target="_blank">Hemsire porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Hentai-cizgi-porno" title="Hentai cizgi porno" target="_blank">Hentai cizgi porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Kizlik-bozma-porno" title="Kizlik bozma porno" target="_blank">Kizlik bozma porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Latin-porno" title="Latin porno" target="_blank">Latin porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Lezbiyen-porno" title="Lezbiyen porno" target="_blank">Lezbiyen porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Liseli-porno" title="Liseli porno" target="_blank">Liseli porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Masturbasyon-Videolari" title="Masturbasyon Videolari" target="_blank">Masturbasyon Videolari</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Oral-porno" title="Oral porno" target="_blank">Oral porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Parti-porno" title="Parti porno" target="_blank">Parti porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Pornostarlar" title="Pornostarlar" target="_blank">Pornostarlar</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Rus-porno" title="Rus porno" target="_blank">Rus porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Tecavuz-porno" title="Tecavuz porno" target="_blank">Tecavuz porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Travesti-shemale-porno" title="Travesti shemale porno" target="_blank">Travesti shemale porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Turbanli-porno" title="Turbanli porno" target="_blank">Turbanli porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Turk-porno" title="Turk porno" target="_blank">Turk porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Webcam-porno" title="Webcam porno" target="_blank">Webcam porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Yasli-porno" title="Yasli porno" target="_blank">Yasli porno</a><a href="http://www.erotikvideoizle.org/kategori/Zenci-porno" title="Zenci porno" target="_blank">Zenci porno</a>
</marquee>
